From jpursley@fnal.gov Mon Mar 22 17:17:07 2010
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:16:12 -0500
From: Jennifer Pursley <jpursley@fnal.gov>
To: Richard St. Denis <r.stdenis@physics.gla.ac.uk>, Sergo Jindariani <sergo@fnal.gov>
Cc: Eric James <jameseb@fnal.gov>
Subject: Reweighted ggH ntps available

Hi Sergo and Rick,

See fcdflnx2:/cdf/spool/jpursley/Reweighting_ggH_ntps

There are 4 versions of each mass point (135, 165, and
195).  The two labeled "_q***.root" are reweighted to
pt distributions with different scale values (given by
the ***).  The two labeled "_syst1**" are reweighted to
pt distributions with different systematic eigenvectors
of the MSTW2008 pdfs.  For each mass point I picked the
one eigenvector with the largest upward deviation and
the one with the largest downward deviation.  For the
mass points 135 and 195, those were eigenvectors 12 and
13, while for 165 those were eigenvectors 13 and 14.

All of these should be checked for shape systematics.
I'll summarize the acceptance rate systematics in this
week's HWW meeting.

Let me know if there are any questions.  I will now
start looking at the eta reweighting from HNNLO.

Thanks,
Jen