Production of the Standard Model Higgs boson at LEP2 would mainly
proceed via the `Higgsstrahlung' process (
Z* HZ).
Additional small contributions would come from ZZ or WW fusion processes
(resulting in He+e- and H
final states
respectively).
Using all of the available Electroweak measurements at the time of
the Spring 1999 conferences, the Higgs mass was indirectly
determined [15] to be
mH = 71+75-425
GeV (central value and 68% C.L. errors) and
mH < 220 GeV
at 95% C.L. For data collected at
183 GeV, the
combined LEP direct search lower mass limit is
mH > 89.7 GeV.
The reconstructed mH in candidate events, from all final
states, is a variable entering the calculation of confidence levels.
Figures 1 and 2 show MC Higgs mass
distributions (
mH = 70 GeV) for various final states, taken from
an ALEPH analysis [16].
The Hl+l- (l = e or ) final state represents 6.7% of the
Higgsstrahlung cross-section. It is characterised by two oppositely
charged isolated leptons, where the mass of the lepton pair is
close to the Z mass. The recoil mass can be calculated from the
ll (
) system, where the
refers to any final state
radiation that is emitted. Due to the high resolution of charged
leptons (see Table 2), the reconstructed Higgs
mass also has high resolution.
The missing energy channel H
represents 20%
of the Higgsstrahlung cross-section. In the event of a signal,
there would be large missing energy,
a missing mass near the Z mass, acoplanar jets and the possibility
of b-tagging these jets. The Higgs mass would have to be reconstructed
from the di-jet mass, so it has larger width and a longer low-mass
tail in the reconstructed mass distribution compared to that of
the Hl+l- channel. This is clearly apparent in
Figure 1. Forward calorimetry that is as
hermetic as possible plays an important part in the event selection,
contributing to the rejection of Z
, We
and Zee events.
The four-jet channel, HZ
b
q
,
comprises 64.6% of the Higgsstrahlung cross-section.
A signal in this final state would contain four isolated jets.
A kinematic fit can be employed,
after which the key trick is to plot
m12 + m34 - mZ.
The subscripts refer to jet pairings options. In Figure 2
the subsequent low mass tail due to jet combinatorics can be seen,
which exists even though only the combination for which
m12 is closest to the nominal Z mass is shown.