 
  
  
   
The experimental signals are the exclusive production of the vector mesons in the following decay modes:
  
 
First results on   and 
higher vector mesons (
  and 
higher vector mesons (  and
  and 
  ) are in 
the early analysis stages and first candidates for
 ) are in 
the early analysis stages and first candidates for 
  are also appearing in the data.
  are also appearing in the data.
The clean topology of these events results in typical errors on the measured 
quantities (t, M2, W2 and Q2), reconstructed in the tracking 
chambers, of order 5%.
Containment within the tracking chambers corresponds to a W interval
in the range   GeV. However, some analyses are restricted
to a reduced range of W where the tracking and trigger systematics 
are well understood. Conversely, H1 have also used the 
shifted vertex data to
extend the analysis of the
  GeV. However, some analyses are restricted
to a reduced range of W where the tracking and trigger systematics 
are well understood. Conversely, H1 have also used the 
shifted vertex data to
extend the analysis of the   cross section to higher
  cross section to higher 
  GeV.
At small t there are problems triggering and, to a lesser extent,
reconstructing the decay products of the vector meson. In particular,
the photoproduction of
  GeV.
At small t there are problems triggering and, to a lesser extent,
reconstructing the decay products of the vector meson. In particular,
the photoproduction of   mesons is limited 
to
  mesons is limited 
to   GeV2, since the produced kaons are just above threshold and 
the available energy in the decay is limited.
In order to characterise the t-dependence, a fit to
the diffractive peak is performed. 
In the most straightforward approach, 
a single exponential fit to the t distribution,
  GeV2, since the produced kaons are just above threshold and 
the available energy in the decay is limited.
In order to characterise the t-dependence, a fit to
the diffractive peak is performed. 
In the most straightforward approach, 
a single exponential fit to the t distribution, 
  for
  for   GeV2 is adopted.
 GeV2 is adopted.
The contributions to the systematic uncertainties are similar in each 
of the measurements.
For example, the uncertainties on acceptance of photoproduced 
  's are due to
uncertainties on trigger thresholds (
 's are due to
uncertainties on trigger thresholds (  9%),
variations of the input Monte Carlo distributions (
  9%),
variations of the input Monte Carlo distributions (  9%)
and track reconstruction uncertainties especially at low pT (
  9%)
and track reconstruction uncertainties especially at low pT (  6%).
In particular for the
  6%).
In particular for the   analysis,
where the mass distribution is skewed compared to a Breit-Wigner shape,
uncertainties arise due to the assumptions of the fit for the interference 
between the resonant signal and the non-resonant background contributions
(
  analysis,
where the mass distribution is skewed compared to a Breit-Wigner shape,
uncertainties arise due to the assumptions of the fit for the interference 
between the resonant signal and the non-resonant background contributions
(  7%). 
Other significant contributions to the uncertainty are contamination due to 
e-gas interactions (
  7%). 
Other significant contributions to the uncertainty are contamination due to 
e-gas interactions (  2-5%) and from higher mass dissociated 
photon states, such as elastic
  2-5%) and from higher mass dissociated 
photon states, such as elastic   and
  and   decays (
  decays (  2-7%).
The uncertainty due to neglecting radiative corrections can also be
estimated to be
  2-7%).
The uncertainty due to neglecting radiative corrections can also be
estimated to be   4-5% [7, 8].
  4-5% [7, 8].
Finally, one of the key problems in obtaining accurate
measurements of the exclusive cross sections and the t slopes 
is the uncertainty on the double dissociation component, where the 
proton has also dissociated into a low mass nucleon system [14]. 
The forward calorimeters will see the dissociation
products of the proton if the invariant mass of the nucleon system, MN,
is above approximately 4 GeV. 
A significant fraction of double dissociation events produce a limited mass 
system which is therefore not detected.
Proton remnant taggers are now being used further down 
the proton beamline to provide constraints on this fraction and, in
the H1 experiment, further constraints are provided by measuring 
secondary interactions in the forward muon system.
Based on   data one finds that the dissociated mass spectrum falls 
as  dN/dMN2 = 1/MNn 
with n = 2.20
  data one finds that the dissociated mass spectrum falls 
as  dN/dMN2 = 1/MNn 
with n = 2.20   0.03 at
  0.03 at   GeV from CDF 
measurements [15].
However it should be noted that this measurement corresponds to a restricted 
mass interval. The extrapolation to lower masses is subject to
uncertainties and the universality of this dissociation is open to experimental
question, given the different behaviour at the upper vertex.
Precisely how the proton dissociates and whether the proton
can be regarded as dissociating independently of the photon system is not 
a priori known. Currently, this uncertainty is reflected in the cross sections
by allowing the value of n to vary from around 2 to 3, although this
choice is somewhat arbitrary.
The magnitude of the total double dissociation contribution is estimated to 
be typically
  GeV from CDF 
measurements [15].
However it should be noted that this measurement corresponds to a restricted 
mass interval. The extrapolation to lower masses is subject to
uncertainties and the universality of this dissociation is open to experimental
question, given the different behaviour at the upper vertex.
Precisely how the proton dissociates and whether the proton
can be regarded as dissociating independently of the photon system is not 
a priori known. Currently, this uncertainty is reflected in the cross sections
by allowing the value of n to vary from around 2 to 3, although this
choice is somewhat arbitrary.
The magnitude of the total double dissociation contribution is estimated to 
be typically   prior to cuts on forward energy deposition, a 
value which can be cross-checked in the data with an overall uncertainty 
of
  prior to cuts on forward energy deposition, a 
value which can be cross-checked in the data with an overall uncertainty 
of   which is due to the considerations above.
Combining the above uncertainties, the overall systematic errors in the 
various cross sections are typically
  which is due to the considerations above.
Combining the above uncertainties, the overall systematic errors in the 
various cross sections are typically   .
 .
Photoproduction processes have been extensively studied in 
fixed-target experiments,
providing a large range in W over which to study the cross sections.
The key features are the weak dependence of the cross section on W, 
an exponential dependence on t with a slope which shrinks with increasing W
and the retention of the helicity of the photon by the vector meson. 
The t dependence of the   photoproduction data is illustrated in 
Figure 2 where the H1 and ZEUS data are 
compared to a compilation of lower energy data [16].
The data are consistent with a shrinkage
of the t slope with increasing
  photoproduction data is illustrated in 
Figure 2 where the H1 and ZEUS data are 
compared to a compilation of lower energy data [16].
The data are consistent with a shrinkage
of the t slope with increasing   , where
 , where
  is the photon energy in the proton rest frame,
as indicated by the curve for soft pomeron exchange [17].
  is the photon energy in the proton rest frame,
as indicated by the curve for soft pomeron exchange [17].
   
 
Figure 2: Dependence of the exponential slope parameter b as a function 
of   for exclusive
  for exclusive   photoproduction compared to the
soft pomeron exchange prediction of Schuler and Sjöstrand.
  photoproduction compared to the
soft pomeron exchange prediction of Schuler and Sjöstrand.
The measured t slopes are 
  GeV-2 (H1) [7] and
  GeV-2 (H1) [7] and 
  GeV-2 (ZEUS) [8] for the
  GeV-2 (ZEUS) [8] for the 
  (where similar single-exponential fits have been 
applied). These values can be compared to
  (where similar single-exponential fits have been 
applied). These values can be compared to 
  GeV-2 (ZEUS) [10] for the
  GeV-2 (ZEUS) [10] for the   and
  and 
  GeV-2 (H1) [13] 
for the
  GeV-2 (H1) [13] 
for the   .
Physically, the slope of the t dependence in diffractive interactions 
tells us about the effective
radius of that interaction, R: 
if d
 .
Physically, the slope of the t dependence in diffractive interactions 
tells us about the effective
radius of that interaction, R: 
if d  , then
b
 , then
b   1/4 R2. The range of measured b slopes varies from 
around 4 GeV-2 (
  1/4 R2. The range of measured b slopes varies from 
around 4 GeV-2 (  fm) to 10 GeV-2 (
  fm) to 10 GeV-2 (  fm). 
Further, the interaction radius can be approximately related to the
radii of the interacting proton and vector meson,
  fm). 
Further, the interaction radius can be approximately related to the
radii of the interacting proton and vector meson, 
  .
Given
 .
Given   fm, 
then this variation in b slopes corresponds to a significant change in 
the effective radius of the interacting vector meson from
  fm, 
then this variation in b slopes corresponds to a significant change in 
the effective radius of the interacting vector meson from 
  fm to
  fm to   fm.
  fm.
   
 
Figure 3: W dependence of the exclusive vector meson and total 
photoproduction cross sections compared to various power law dependences
discussed in the text.
Integrating over the measured t dependence, 
the W dependence of the results on 
exclusive vector meson photoproduction cross sections 
are shown in Figure 3 [18]. From the experimental perspective,
there is generally good agreement on the measured cross sections.
The   total cross section is also shown in Figure 3, 
rising with increasing 
energy as in hadron-hadron collisions and consistent with a value of
  total cross section is also shown in Figure 3, 
rising with increasing 
energy as in hadron-hadron collisions and consistent with a value of 
  i.e. the total cross section increases as W0.16.
  i.e. the total cross section increases as W0.16.
Given the dominance of the pomeron trajectory at high W and
an approximately exponential behaviour of the |t| distribution with slope 
  , whose mean
 , whose mean   value
is given by 1/b, the diffractive cross section
rise is moderated from
  value
is given by 1/b, the diffractive cross section
rise is moderated from
  
 
to
  
 
Here   characterises the effective energy dependence 
after integration over t. 
The observed shrinkage of the diffractive peak 
therefore corresponds to a relative reduction
of the diffractive cross section with increasing energy. 
Such a dependence describes the general increase of the
  characterises the effective energy dependence 
after integration over t. 
The observed shrinkage of the diffractive peak 
therefore corresponds to a relative reduction
of the diffractive cross section with increasing energy. 
Such a dependence describes the general increase of the 
  ,
 ,   and
  and   vector meson cross sections with increasing W.
However, the rise of the
  vector meson cross sections with increasing W.
However, the rise of the   cross section is clearly not described 
by such a W dependence, the increase being described by an 
effective W0.8 dependence. Whilst these effective powers are for
illustrative purposes only, it is clear that in exclusive
  cross section is clearly not described 
by such a W dependence, the increase being described by an 
effective W0.8 dependence. Whilst these effective powers are for
illustrative purposes only, it is clear that in exclusive   production
a new phenomenon is occurring.
  production
a new phenomenon is occurring.
Qualitatively, the W0.8 dependence, corresponding to 
  , 
could be ascribed 
to the rise of the gluon density observed in the scaling violations of
F2. 
The
 , 
could be ascribed 
to the rise of the gluon density observed in the scaling violations of
F2. 
The   mass scale, M2, is larger than the QCD scale
  mass scale, M2, is larger than the QCD scale 
  , and it is therefore possible to apply pQCD 
techniques.
Quantitatively, the theoretical analysis predicts that 
the rise of the cross section is proportional to the square of the gluon
density at small-x and allows discrimination among the latest 
parametrisations
of the proton structure function [19].
We also know from measurements of the DIS
 , and it is therefore possible to apply pQCD 
techniques.
Quantitatively, the theoretical analysis predicts that 
the rise of the cross section is proportional to the square of the gluon
density at small-x and allows discrimination among the latest 
parametrisations
of the proton structure function [19].
We also know from measurements of the DIS   total cross 
section that application of formula (1) results in a value of
  total cross 
section that application of formula (1) results in a value of   which increases with increasing Q2, with
  
which increases with increasing Q2, with   0.2 to 0.25 
at
  0.2 to 0.25 
at   GeV2 [18].
The fact that the corresponding relative rise of F2 with decreasing 
x can be described by pQCD evolution [20]
points towards a calculable function
  GeV2 [18].
The fact that the corresponding relative rise of F2 with decreasing 
x can be described by pQCD evolution [20]
points towards a calculable function   for
 
for   GeV2.
 GeV2.
One contribution to the DIS   total cross section is
the electroproduction of low mass vector mesons.
Experimentally, the statistical errors typically dominate with 
systematic uncertainties similar to the
photoproduction case. The trigger uncertainties are significantly
reduced, however, since the scattered electron is easily identified
and the radiative
corrections, which are more significant (
  total cross section is
the electroproduction of low mass vector mesons.
Experimentally, the statistical errors typically dominate with 
systematic uncertainties similar to the
photoproduction case. The trigger uncertainties are significantly
reduced, however, since the scattered electron is easily identified
and the radiative
corrections, which are more significant (  [21]),
can be corrected for. 
The W dependence of the DIS
  [21]),
can be corrected for. 
The W dependence of the DIS   and
  and   cross sections
for finite values of Q2 are shown in Figure 4,
compared to the corresponding photoproduction cross sections.
The W dependence for the
  cross sections
for finite values of Q2 are shown in Figure 4,
compared to the corresponding photoproduction cross sections.
The W dependence for the   and
  and   electroproduction 
data are similar to those for
the
  electroproduction 
data are similar to those for
the   photoproduction data, consistent
with an approximate W0.8 dependence also shown in Figure 4.
An important point to emphasise here is that the relative production of
  photoproduction data, consistent
with an approximate W0.8 dependence also shown in Figure 4.
An important point to emphasise here is that the relative production of 
  to
  to   mesons approaches the quark model prediction of 2/9 at large
W and large Q2, which would indicate the applicability 
of pQCD to these cross sections.
The measurements
of the helicity angle of the vector meson decay provide a measurement of
  mesons approaches the quark model prediction of 2/9 at large
W and large Q2, which would indicate the applicability 
of pQCD to these cross sections.
The measurements
of the helicity angle of the vector meson decay provide a measurement of 
  for the (virtual) photon, assuming s-channel helicity
conservation, i.e. that the vector meson preserves the helicity of the photon.
The photoproduction measurements for the
  for the (virtual) photon, assuming s-channel helicity
conservation, i.e. that the vector meson preserves the helicity of the photon.
The photoproduction measurements for the   are consistent with the 
interaction of 
dominantly transversely polarised photons
(
  are consistent with the 
interaction of 
dominantly transversely polarised photons
(  (ZEUS) [8]). However, adopting the same 
analysis for virtual photons, 
R=1.5+2.8-0.6 (ZEUS) [8], 
inconsistent with the behaviour in photoproduction and
consistent with a predominantly longitudinal exchange. 
This predominance is expected for an underlying 
interaction of the virtual photon with the constituent quarks of the
  (ZEUS) [8]). However, adopting the same 
analysis for virtual photons, 
R=1.5+2.8-0.6 (ZEUS) [8], 
inconsistent with the behaviour in photoproduction and
consistent with a predominantly longitudinal exchange. 
This predominance is expected for an underlying 
interaction of the virtual photon with the constituent quarks of the   .
Also, the measured 
b slope approximately halves
from the photoproduction case to a value of
 .
Also, the measured 
b slope approximately halves
from the photoproduction case to a value of
  (ZEUS) [8], comparable to that
in the photoproduced
  (ZEUS) [8], comparable to that
in the photoproduced   case.
The
basic interaction is probing smaller distances, which allows a first comparison
of the observed cross section with the predictions of leading-log 
pQCD (see [8]).
  case.
The
basic interaction is probing smaller distances, which allows a first comparison
of the observed cross section with the predictions of leading-log 
pQCD (see [8]).
   
 
Figure 4: W dependence of exclusive (a)   and (b)
  and (b)   electroproduction cross sections for fixed values of Q2 compared
to various power law dependences discussed in the text.
  
electroproduction cross sections for fixed values of Q2 compared
to various power law dependences discussed in the text.
Finally, first results based on the observation of 42   events at
significant
  events at
significant   GeV2 have been reported by H1 [13].
The cross section has been evaluated in two W intervals in order 
to obtain an indication of the W dependence, as shown in
Figure 5, where an estimated 50% contribution due to double dissociation has
been subtracted [22].
The electroproduction data are shown with statistical errors only
although the systematics are estimated to be smaller than these errors
(
  GeV2 have been reported by H1 [13].
The cross section has been evaluated in two W intervals in order 
to obtain an indication of the W dependence, as shown in
Figure 5, where an estimated 50% contribution due to double dissociation has
been subtracted [22].
The electroproduction data are shown with statistical errors only
although the systematics are estimated to be smaller than these errors
(  ). 
The electroproduction and photoproduction
 ). 
The electroproduction and photoproduction   data are consistent with 
the W0.8 dependence (
  data are consistent with 
the W0.8 dependence (  ) noted previously.
The
 ) noted previously.
The   electroproduction cross section is of the same order of 
that of the
  electroproduction cross section is of the same order of 
that of the   data, in marked contrast to the significantly lower 
photoproduction cross section for the
  data, in marked contrast to the significantly lower 
photoproduction cross section for the   , even at HERA energies, 
also shown in Figure 5.
Further results in this area would allow tests of the underlying dynamics 
for transverse and longitudinally polarised photons coupling to light
and heavy quarks in the pQCD calculations.
 , even at HERA energies, 
also shown in Figure 5.
Further results in this area would allow tests of the underlying dynamics 
for transverse and longitudinally polarised photons coupling to light
and heavy quarks in the pQCD calculations.
   
 
Figure 5: H1 measurements of the W dependence of 
electroproduction and photoproduction cross sections of exclusive vector 
mesons.
In conclusion, there is an accumulating body of exclusive vector meson
production data, measured with a systematic precision of   , which
exhibit two classes of W2 behaviour: a slow rise consistent with that
of previously measured diffractive data for low M2 photoproduction
data but a significant rise of these cross sections 
when a finite Q2 and/or a significant M2 is measured.
 , which
exhibit two classes of W2 behaviour: a slow rise consistent with that
of previously measured diffractive data for low M2 photoproduction
data but a significant rise of these cross sections 
when a finite Q2 and/or a significant M2 is measured.
 
  
 